Intellectual Technology
Advanced thinking / Advanced reasoning
Intellectual technology to solve problems
caused by governmental / organizational technology.
....................Think.ws
DougBuchanan.com
What the dictionary editors and English teachers still fail
to convey....
Think: to think: (1) the mind's process of asking and answering
questions, identifying and resolving contradictions.
Compare that definition with the nebulous and useless dictionary
definitions of the word, think.
Therefore understand why Americans continue pondering, reflecting
upon, calling upon, judging,
evaluating, analyzing, remembering, forming opinions, being certain,
inventing, believing, inferring,
conceiving, considering, viewing, reviewing, devising, advising,
anticipating, weighing, simulating, intending,
challenging, envisioning, imagining, regarding, fancying, speculating,
deliberating, and doing everything except:
Asking and answering questions that identify and resolve contradictions
to therefore solve problems.
Ignorant of how to think, because they were not taught the process,
or even the useful definition,
the government people, their think tanks, experts, school teachers,
professors, and the legions of
non-self questioning (unthinking) citizen organization leaders
they produced, cannot and will not
solve the human-caused problems resulting from that ignorance.
But with that knowledge, you can....
Alaska Intech Ltd.
1957 Weston Drive
Fairbanks, Alaska 99709
phone: + 907 479 2149
Doug at DougBuchanan.com (replace at with @)
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
If you want to most effectively hide something from the humans, make it more obvious than everything around it. If you were capable of creating the most brilliant knowledge puzzle in the universe, in addition to the universe, with a solution the humans obviously want more than any other knowledge but as a society remain perpetually frustrated trying to discover it, would you not make the solution openly available for the asking?
17, 10, 9 July, and 3 June 2010 comments below the following.
It is just a puzzle of knowledge. Anyone can learn it.
It is the process to efficiently solve any problem that humans have created, regardless of how seemingly complex or impossible.
It is a process of efficiently asking and answering effective questions of each resulting contradiction, until all related questions are answered.
The solution may then be promptly manifested, with opposition concurrently defeated.
Opposition is merely a contradiction, resolved within the process.
The solution to the puzzle always existed, available for discovery, like all knowledge.
The disguise of the knowledge is its simplicity, the reason it is so rarely discovered.
It is the most brilliant puzzle a human can learn. As an aside, it identifies the controlling design of the human mind.
To learn it one need only ask and answer a certain type of questions in a certain order, the process to learn any knowledge.
As an aside, it is the process of how to not be corrupted by power, thus creating wisdom.
It identifies verifiable truth, that which is most feared by the mind, and thus not effectively questioned.
The above is part of its disguise. Notice who does not ask and answer their related questions.
To promptly solve complex problems and achieve seemingly impossible institutional goals:
New readers who are interested in learning intellectual technology might first consider the Introduction page and then Pages 1 and 2.
Otherwise the most recent entries are first below, then on the highest page number (34).
Intech Concepts 32 includes two sections that may be of most efficient utility.
IntechConcepts 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
***********
Nothing herein is of value or utility to your mind until it asks and answers every question of your mind's perceived contradictions to the following. And if you identify a concluding contradiction, please notify the writer of these worlds. If his questions verify your conclusion, he will change his conclusion, conforming to logic, and thank you for your having advanced his knowledge.
If you are too impatient to read slowly and think while you are reading the words on this website, then one of the countless sound-byte type websites might be more suitable for your interests. Reading sound-byte type rhetoric, rather than thorough reasoning, cannot possibly offer knowledge that is useful for your mind's subsequent decisions.
Definition of dumbed-down Americans.... 17 July 2010
The inability of Americans, to accurately and verifiably describe or define human rights, with human rights being a controlling concept of human existence, defines the dumbed-down Americans.
Go ahead, ask your children to flawlessly define human rights, to recognize how useless to themselves you have left them, as gullible victims of whichever power-damaged mind with an institutional title wants to tell them what they must do, and are not allowed to do, by decree.
A common process to dumb-down Americans..... 10 July 2010
This is how you are dumbing down your children, and how your parents, schools and government dumbed you down, if you concur.....
It is beyond the thinking ability of government personnel, from the president to his lowest echelon minions, and their supporters, to recognize or understand that they are just common humans with the same brain and mind design as everyone who does not have a government job, including themselves before they got a government job. Therein all the common derogatory adjectives used to describe government dolts are founded in substance.
The proof is flawless.....
(If you can understand these plain English words of the reasoning of the proof, you are not, or soon will not be among the dumbed-down Americans as you question and reason your way to advancing knowledge, which will get you fired if you are a government dolt, at great benefit to you.)
For common person X to cause person Y to perform an action, X must convey to Y the reasoning that causes Y's current knowledge base to recognize a benefit from the action. Therein reasoning is used, and any questions are answered with more reasoning. Because Y inherently holds knowledge that is different from X, the reasoning must include an understanding or learning of knowledge beyond that held by X, and therefore the knowledge of each is advanced as the different knowledge is synthesized with each person's current knowledge, by process of X describing a benefit from the action.
That describes private enterprise, wherein your mind must recognize a benefit from your willfully spending of your money for a product or service. The result may not be a benefit, as you may learn later, but you will therefore learn that additional knowledge for your future decisions. Your decisions will advance your knowledge.
An example of learning new knowledge, even government chaps learning new knowledge, albeit a dramatic example because such examples are more interesting...... I once met a person who stated that he would kill his own family if he thought they were involved with any (recreational) drugs. His ilk saturates the police institution, perhaps to a lesser degree, only imprisoning "the other guy" and not one's family. He had a government law enforcement job, perceiving that his decisions were superior to the decisions of those common humans, because he was government. Two years later, because of certain unusually specific, occasional correspondence involving questions (reasoning) designed to synthesize different knowledge, he responded with a complete reversal of his prior conclusion, stating that all drugs should be legal for adults, since adults should exclusively own and manage their own bodies which include their brains, the most basic human right upon which all rights are dependent, because government personnel are too incompetent to manage even their own bodies (since they perceive that government should manage their bodies), and certainly hold no rational ability to own or manage the bodies of other humans who hold different knowledge (a prerogative of God and slave owners).
In contrast to common person X, a government dolt holds the institutional power of the government to more conveniently demand that Y perform an action, under threat of jail initiated by armed, notoriously trigger-happy, unquestioning police and a gaggle of enforcement-budget dependent prosecutors, judges, jailers, bail administration bureaucrats, secretaries, Prison Industries Inc officials and a legion of other government dolts avidly supporting (paying-off) legislators to make more laws creating more government power.
THEREFORE, the government dolts hold no incentive or imperative to articulate the reasoning for the action. They simply threaten arrest or fines backed by arrest and jail. They therefore do not have to think, reason or synthesize any different knowledge held by Y.
THEREFORE, neither the government dolts or person Y share the complete knowledge of the reasoning related to the action, or its lacking, to synthesize it with their prior knowledge and what they learn in the process, to learn the knowledge more advanced than that prior held by each one of them.
Therein, by decree of the government dolts, they each learn and retain only their current institutional illusions, analogous to that held by the government cartographers who decreed that Earth was flat, and that Christopher Columbus should not be funded to physically question the government knowledge base.
Therefore, to the extent that you or your children deal within private enterprise, you will advance your knowledge beyond the competition among humans competing for new benefits of greater knowledge. Your children will learn the reasoning for doing or not doing things, which then becomes useful for other things.
And therefore, to the extent that you or your children deal within government, you will be dumbed-down to the paucity of intellectual ability that the world ridicules as the dumbed-down Americans and their Roman styled war machine that functions on force, which is therefore doomed. In the designed human competition for more knowledge and its benefits, dumb people lose.
A government functioning on force instead of reasoning, as is the case with all military and police-based governments, is comprised of dumb people and dumb supporters, most obviously those of America.
If your children do things because "it's the law", as cops teach their children to keep them dumb, they will not learn the diverse, vastly more valuable reasoning for doing or not doing diverse things. If your children wear seat belts, don't smoke dope, don't steal things and don't rape people, because "it's the law", you taught them to be that dumb in all things. Do YOU not kill your neighbor because "it's the law", or because it creates a damage and a few dozen other obviously valid reasons? Well, what do you teach your children? What process teaches your children to use and practice reasoning (their thinking ability) instead of the force of muscles and police guns? What intellectual ability do your children have when "the law" is not applicable to an action, or "the law" is obviously wrong? Shall you have taught them to be confused, and unable to make a rational decision? Who have made fools of themselves obeying obviously illogical laws imposed by corrupted law makers and regulation-writing bureaucrats who were paid-off by lobbyists and such crooks, that were belatedly ruled as unconstitutional and therefore never of any effect? It was "the law" that women could not vote, and Blacks must sit in the back of the bus, etceteras. Those laws would still be "the law" if all parents taught their children to obey the law because "it's the law", instead of use their minds to figure out the flaws of the excuses to use force of law above reasoning.
The laws against smoking hemp, adopted by corrupted congressmen who were paid off by the cotton industry lobbyists, and enforced by monumentally dumb, unquestioning, unthinking and malicious cops, will belatedly be repealed by REASONING people who belatedly recognize the mountain of lies used to impose and sustain those laws. If somebody unlawfully smokes pot to laugh, instead of lawfully drink alcohol to become belligerent and start a fight or cause an automobile accident, who is damaged against their will? Precisely why, in your written words for the public to judge your reasoning ability, is there a law against a beneficial action that damages no unwilling person? Do you smoke or not smoke hemp because of YOUR MIND'S REASONING, or because "it's the law"? With highly paid, socially elevated lawyers and judges smoking more hemp than any other professional group (since artists are mostly not professionals), are your children so dumb as to obey the law, because "it's the law" that the judicial branch violates with impunity and laughter? Who makes fools of people who function on "the law" instead of their own reasoning ability? Many lawyers and judges are smoking hemp while you are reading these words. What have you taught your children about "the law"? After over 70 years and billions of YOUR tax dollars wasted on the law against smoking hemp, not one person in America lacks for readily available, untaxed hemp, which is one of the reasons hemp smokers laugh robustly at "the law". But those comments relate to reasoning, that of which cops and their indoctrinated children remain clueless.
What is more valuable to you and your children, the knowledge of the human mind's reasoning ability, or "the law"?
Enjoy the comedy of the American government sorts and their supporters who cannot understand a word of the above.
It is an aside to mention the amusing responses the writer of these words gets from government people and their supporters who accuse the writer of all possible word arrangements describing a completely incoherent idiot, a nut case babbling and rambling on with lunatic rants and diatribes of undecipherable things, and worse, much to his amusement.
If you are not laughing at the humans who use their minds to flatter themselves, attempt to make the decisions of other people, attempt to force those decisions on other people, and cannot think beyond "the law", instead of learning new knowledge by reasoning through contradictions, you are missing the only show they know how to stage.
Laugh..... 9 July 2010
In the future, children will laugh at their primitive ancestors of today, who were so intellectually retarded that they willfully acquiesced to forced taxation, that is, slavery to a therefore increasingly counter productive gang of government parrots doing nothing for which commonly intelligent people would voluntarily pay their money, as proven by the act of forced taxation.
No excuses or rhetorical illusions of potential good negate or excuse the controlling contradiction of the use of force above reasoning.
The use of force instead of reasoning dooms that for which force is used, by the verifiable intent of the design, and therefore the design.
And among the many popular proofs of that intellectual retardation of the dumbed down Americans of today will be that of US King Barack Obama (with the official title of president) who hired over a dozen handmaidens for this wife, giving them over 100,000 taxpayer dollars per year to only fluff around flattering the president's wife, plus millions of tax dollars for their "expenses", with the taxpayer slaves not impeaching the president, recalling their congressional "representatives" for approving the funding, or running the king out of the country, for that unlawful, disgusting expenditure of public money.
If you attempt any defense of those tax paid handmaidens for a US President's spouse, her close friends, simply read the resumes of those handmaidens, to learn the nature of all government employment.
And with the trillions of dollars of corporate taxes and countless other layers of taxes all directly passed on to the end product and service users, the vast bulk of those tax dollars come from the poorest 30 percent of the American people, to pay for the handmaidens of king's wives. How many of you earn over $100,000 per year, with nearly unlimited expense accounts for your every expense except the meals you cook at home?
Who of you would publicly ascribe your name to support the forced seizure of tax money from those people earning less than $10,000 per year, to pay government drones vastly more for doing nothing the people will willingly pay money, as is the case? Well, do you vote for DemocanRepublicrats, and then lie to your children, keeping them ignorant and thus less intellectually capable than people who learn truth, by obscuring your direct support for taxing people who earn less than $10,000 per year, to pay government drones vastly more for doing nothing the people will willingly pay money, as is the case?
Of course the examples of the previous US presidents are as many, but you may concur that over a dozen handmaidens, at that huge expenditure of tax money, for a president's spouse, rivals the expenditures of the Egyptian Pharaohs and Roman Emperors for the same "public services" (for the leaders only).
And of course the tax funded US Presidential Ego Gratification Wars (Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Panama, Grenada, Bosnia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia and several others not so well known), that is, slaughters of poor people in other countries, will be the most common examples of the intellectual void and Neanderthal character of today's humans, but the handmaidens for an early 2000's US President's wife will not escape the notice of the descendants of the intellectually absent tax payers of this era.
Do not wonder why the US empire will go the way of the Roman empire, and all such force-based empires, because dumbed down Americans kept voting for DemocanRepublicrats, and why the children of the future will be laughing at the American slaves who could not yet figure out how to use their mind for its designed purpose.
Cure for killing....... 3 June 2010
By chance of the specific knowledge-learning events of my life, I hold the knowledge, verifiable against all questions all people can ask, to be able to openly identify any power-damaged mind of any future murderer who is willing to murder people, before he kills anyone, and cause him to never murder anyone, using intellectual technology.
I can cause a known murderer to never murder again, using intellectual technology.
Concurrently, with the assistance of a neurology researcher, and modern brain activity instruments, we can identify the precise neural location(s) for the decision to kill other humans, and further quantify and qualify every separable neural action in relation to the conclusion to kill, leaving the neurologist and a body chemistry sort to discover the medical process (electrical or chemical) to cure potential murderers before they murder anyone, or cure a known murderer, verifiable against all questions all neurologists, chemists, body electricians and everyone else can ask.
Now, if that is true, and it is, would not that knowledge be avidly sought by all the common people in the US, especially those city chaps and others who are generally afraid of everything, and sought by any neurologist who wanted to make himself or herself famous?
Laugh.
Who do those common Americans hire to solve the problem of people murdering Americans?
The answer - cops, military chaps and legions of other government agency personnel.
How much total money flow goes to cops, military chaps and government each year? Is that not a multi hundred billion dollar flow that is dependent upon the sustained existence of people "out there" who will murder and otherwise damage Americans?
If you can't figure it out from the above arrangement of words, for the entire spectrum of government actions, you are a common American successfully dumbed down by the government's public school process, and by the most obvious products of that school system, the American news journalists further dumbing down Americans with the most ludicrous government lies ever told, reported as fact.
The vast empire of American cops, prosecutors and judges (your parents or children if among them) knowingly and intentionally imprison harmless people who violated no prevailing law, harmed nobody and who demonstrate no intent to ever harm anyone. They are imprisoned on the government scam of accusing them of violating inferior laws, without telling them, and criminally evading the known legal duty to inform them that the applied inferior laws are contradicted by superior laws, thus those inferior laws are void and hold no effect as law (over 85 percent of all arrests). The incentives are, first and absolute, the brain's trained addiction to exercising "power" over other humans, and agency budget excuses insuring job security, and to sustain the extremely profitable Prison Industries Incorporated (slave labor) whose stocks are largely owned by the aforementioned government chaps.
AND the corollary is more damaging... the cops, prosecutors and judges knowingly and intentionally (verifiable) efficiently return to the streets the great majority of real criminals, by the usual legalistic maneuvers, ("revolving door") to maintain the social damages (murders, rapes, robberies, assault, etc.) that fool dumbed-down American fools into demanding yet more police, prosecutors, judges and government thugs, and thus demand that said American taxpaying fools work more hours to pay more taxes for more government to damage the American fools more by the aforementioned easily verifiable process.
The majority of Americans are that extensively ignorant (lacking in available knowledge) of human fundamentals, as once was I. The majority of Americans will remain that amusingly clueless even if they read these words, by design of the power-damaged mind (he who supports the use of power to damage people under any ruse, such as voting for the DemocanRepublicrats who keep funding the criminal police, prosecutors, judges and all the other government thugs, for their manifested purpose of keeping real criminals on the streets to create the lucrative budget excuses for more police, prosecutors, judges and higher pay).
You are wisely the exception to the above, because you ask real questions of these words, and answer them, as with all things, to make the resulting knowledge useful for your next questions. Is that not so?
A supporting example of how easily unquestioning people are fooled with lies, is revealed by the process that created the US income tax. When the intelligent rich people concluded that a majority of the dumbed-down Americans had been fooled by the normally lying DemocanRepublicrat politicians, into believing that they could get something for nothing, by taxing the rich to pay for the government serving the poor (a classic fool's illusion), the commonly intelligent rich chaps paying off certain of those DemocanRepublicrats in the Senate, therefore easily designed the income tax system to include certain obscure "prevailing law" and "settled law" supreme court cases that by only slightly convoluted but flawlessly logical process, for imperative to maintain a private enterprise system that could financially support an inherently greedy government, exempted the rich business people, and turned the taxes back on the dumbed-down, unquestioning low and middle income majority of voters, the functionally uneducated (public school educated) Americans who were fooled into believing they could get something for nothing.
If you ask enough questions about the US tax system, including the comparatively inconsequential income tax, to therefore learn the related KNOWLEDGE of taxation systems (theft by force), you recognize that the poor and middle income Americans are paying for the government that attacks them and benefits the rich, and further, the taxes paid by the rich logically and fairly pay for the government programs that benefit the rich, leaving zero for the poor. The rich are not getting something for nothing. They are getting vast wealth from their investment of extremely valuable thinking time to learn how to fool unquestioning people with the contradictions that the greedy majority of voters created to attempt to get something for nothing, to make somebody else, the rich, pay for benefits going to people who are not comparatively working for those (mostly damaging) "benefits" to the middle class, using the most obvious DemocanRepublicrat lies ever told by any human, believed by people who ask no questions, or ineffective questions.
It is impossible to get something for nothing, or more for less. There is no free lunch. And if a person is sufficiently ignorant to believe he can get something for nothing (make the rich pay for the government to benefit the middle class and poor), then he is ignorant enough, and sufficiently unquestioning, to easily have his greed turned against him with easily crafted laws that sound like they make the rich pay for the government benefiting the poor. The poorest people in the US pay the greatest percentage of their income in taxes, with the income tax inconsequential in proportion to the countless other "passed-on" taxes which are increasing in number every year under the insatiable federal, State and local governments and their "permit fee" requiring bureaucracies. The super rich and knowledgeable rich pay no taxes. You pay their taxes in the products and services they offer, that include every expense, including their taxes and their accounting costs for the paperwork to pay the taxes, plus an additional charge for the logical value of intelligently administering those higher dollar figures. Therefore you pay all the "corporate" or business taxes, among a long list of "passed-on" taxes, the personal taxes of the business owners passed on in the cost of their products, plus the "tax" or fee to the business owners for their thinking and staff administration time spent dealing with the taxes.
If Americans knew the actual (scant) cost to produce and retail any common product, without all the government-induced taxes and costs going to pay Obama's wife's dozen hand maidens over $100,000 per year, and such corruption, there would be a revolution by early morning.
The example of the US taxation system is comparable to the example of the US law enforcement and judicial systems fooling fools into believing that the government system solves problems rather than creates and sustains the damaging problems to fool more fools into giving government more money to solve the problems that government holds no incentive to solve, and is diminished in wealth and power if it does solve the problems.
For how many days would you pay a baker for a loaf of bread, if he took your money each day for a promised loaf of bread that you never received? How long have the dumbed down Americans paid for a police system that has increased damaging crime on the streets while filling the costly prisons with a majority of people who VERIFIABLY harmed nobody?
The power-damaged minds of the "powerful majority" (mob) of unquestioning American voters will keep paying the government to functionally keep the murderers (and other private sector thugs) on the streets to randomly murder Americans, their families and others. But that system creates a real damage that eventually illuminates its flaw among slow-learning humans. Therefore the inherently, increasingly desperate government chaps must use progressively more desperate tactics to maintain the illusion. The obvious current tactic was to facilitate the "terrorists" to the extent that every American is now a "suspected terrorist", and more police are required to hunt them down, functionally identical to the Nazi tactic of defining Jews and Gypsies ("undesirables") as "criminals".
Of course the system is doomed, by design. Wiser to be the current victim of government rather than a current government thug or minion. Things always change.
Therefore the greatest threat to the insatiable government whose wealth and power is 100 percent dependent upon protecting and increasing the number of killers and such thugs in society, is the KNOWLEDGE that can cure killing. Government chaps, each by name, will kill their own families before they allow that knowledge to be socially effected, verifiable in front of their families and the public by the type simple questions that flawless identify the power-damaged minds of killers (and therefore subject to be cured by an extended questioning process, before they would kill anyone, verifiable.)
Consider the fatal heart attacks among the military generals, police captains, lawyers, judges, prison wardens and DemocanRepublicrats if their mind could comprehend the inherent existence of the always-available process that can efficiently cure murderers and other criminals, without the use of force, therein destroying the most damaging criminal enterprise in human history - government, the concept that maintains the comedy of unquestioning humans killing each other instead of asking questions to learn the knowledge to efficiently resolve the obviously damaging contradiction of humans killing each other.
And because they are so successfully dumbed down, with the laughable lies taught in the government's public schools, the Americans will not ask for the knowledge, or even ask enough questions to recognize its inherent existence, even if they read these words. They will keep paying their money to the institutions, both government and private, that maintain the problems that maintain the gullible Americans sending them money.
Precisely why, with YOUR flawlessly accurate answer openly stated for the public judgment of your thinking ability, do you perceive that the same net effect of wars, prisons, opulent lifestyles of the government officialdom, including Michel Obama's dozen handmaidens paid over $100,000 per year, and taxation that robs the people of the opportunities they work for, achieved by Hitler, Stalin, Hussein, the Roman emperors, the Kans, the Huns, the Neanderthals, and British kings, the other European kings, the Pharaohs and the Middle East war lords including those of the Jews, are in full effect in the United States of America right now today?
No human could ever create such a perfect brain design to maintain the perfect comedy of humans needlessly attacking themselves to fail to solve the problem of the humans attacking themselves, and repeating the show every day and night for millennium, much to the amusement of the creator, and the laughter of the observers who simply used the brain's design to ask the questions to learn the process and thus the "punch line" that creates the perpetual laughter at the humans.
Is that not so?
Enjoy the show.
***********
New readers who are interested in learning intellectual technology might first consider the Introduction page and then Pages 1 and 2.
Previous visitors and casual internet surfers might start with the most recent entries on the highest page number (35).
Intech Concepts 32 includes two sections that may be of most efficient utility.
IntechConcepts 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1